New fire safety norms for city high rises

New rules for Bengaluru place major penalties on owners/occupiers of unsafe buildings above 15 metres in height or high rises. Check out this guide to stay ahead.

In the first half of 2011 alone, 1172 fire cases were reported in Bengaluru (BBMP) limits, says a top Karnataka fire department official. Following the High Court’s ruling on a PIL filed by the Beyond Carlton group, the state government issued a notification on July 7 this year. The notification mandates co-ordination between BBMP and the state’s Fire and Emergency Services department to check for fire safety in high rises.

High rises (buildings with height above 15 m) are supposed to abide by safety norms of BBMP’s building bye-laws, RMP (Revised Master Plan) and NBC (National Building Code). Unlike earlier, the new notification authorises the fire department to inspect buildings routinely and to impose penalties/suspend services in case of non-compliance.

New Norms for high rises

  • To get plan sanction, builder should submit an NOC from Fire department to BBMP.
  • After construction, Fire department will inspect the building and give a Clearance Certificate (CC). BBMP will give Occupancy Certificate (OC) for the building only after the CC is issued.
  • Fire Officers (FOs) of the rank of District Fire Officer or above will inspect buildings once every two years, along with a representative of residents/tenants, and give a report. The residents’ representative will be notified seven days before the inspection.
  • FO will issue a Fire Safety Certificate which should be presented to BBMP for permission renewal once in two years.
  • Residents should also have their buildings inspected by agencies empanelled by the fire department. This inspection report along with an affidavit on condition of fire safety system should be submitted to BBMP and fire department once every two years.
  • Additionally, there will be surprise inspections.
How it used to work

 

» Builder should get Fire department NOC before BBMP’s plan sanction.
» Should get Clearance Certificate so that BBMP issues OC
» No provision for inspections later

Many buildings used to get OC without any certifications too. B G Changappa, Director at Fire and Emergency Services, says, “In case of violation, we would write to the applicant (builder) and BBMP about it. Sometimes applicants correct violations and re-apply, sometimes they don’t.”

New measures: penalties

  • On violations, Fire Officer will send a notice to residents giving them three months’ time to comply. If they do not comply or respond, FO can ask BESCOM to disconnect power supply to the building.
  • FO can also seal the building and ask BBMP to suspend the building’s OC. After this entry and exit to the building would be allowed only for completing the work.
  • On completing the work, residents can intimate FO. If satisfied on re-inspection, he can ask BESCOM to restore power and allow entry/exit into the building. But residents will have to get fresh OC from BBMP by producing Fire Safety Certificate.
  • Builders who violate norms after getting the initial NOC can be criminally prosecuted under Fire Services Act, 1964.
  • Existing high rises which do not have NOC and BBMP’s Commencement Certificate (issued before construction starts) will be cleared only if there are no violations. Even then they have to pay four times the current government fee as penalty.
  • Non-complying buildings will not be entitled to Sakrama.

The new rules are effective from July 7, 2011.

Government deadlines as per the new notification

  • Fire department to inspect all high rises in the city and state within nine months of the notification.
  • All government high rises to have fire safety systems in place within one year of the notification.
RELATED
RELATED

Related Articles

Fire safety norms for city high-rises

Comments:

  1. Sanjay Vijayaraghavan says:

    Interesting. What provisions are in place that this does not become another area where people have to shell our bribes? Fire safety is required, not improving income of officials and their chain of bribing.

    Want an analogue of similar provisions gone bad – ever heard of the Electrical Inspectorate? Go ask any building manager about the goals of the electrical inspectorate. I have. The answer is … getting bribes. Also note that electrical safety has a direct bearing on fire safety also.

  2. nagesh says:

    request for model/sample affadivit to obtain clearance certificate from Karnataka fire and Emergency department

  3. Deepak Gupta says:

    Hi, I want to know that one building’s apartment caught fire and the living room sofa burned there was electrical fitting behind the sofa which is the probable root cause of fire. Now society issued a certificate that they got it checked with 3 electrician and short circuit is not a reason and tenant has to pay for loss. is the society claim is sufficient? they do not have inspected the fire safety norms within 2 year can you provide me the list of measurement which should be in place in an apartment as for fire safety. If you require any fee, please let me know we can have a brief discussion about the case. many thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

What’s behind first time voters’ lukewarm response in these hot summer elections?

Voting is every citizen's right and duty but why are young voters not enthusiastic about making a difference in the world's largest democracy?

“Just, I mean, I don’t feel like voting. This politics and all. I didn’t even apply, I think I was late,” rattled one of my students when I asked if they had all registered to vote as most of them had turned 18 one or two years ago.  This was pretty much the chorus. They spoke about how it was too late when they tried to register, how it was so difficult (which was promptly rejected by those who had done it), how they were in a different city, how they were not interested in politics and how it was…

Similar Story

Low voter turnout in Bengaluru: Citizens highlight discrepancies in electoral rolls

Bengaluru recorded a voter turnout of 57.43%. Voters reported issues like deletions, duplications and names of deceased voters in the electoral rolls.

Almost half of Bengaluru's citizens did not vote in the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections. The city recorded a 57.43% voter turnout this year, not much of an improvement from the previous 2019 elections. The low voter turnout has often been ascribed to apathy, but this alone is not a satisfactory explanation. Several factors have been cited for the low voter turnout, from discrepancies in electoral rolls to the scorching heat. Voter roll errors: Deletions, duplications and deceased names There were complaints that hundreds of voter names were either deleted or missing in Chickpet and Akkipet in Bangalore Central.  In a…