It’s official: Three smaller Bengalurus to emerge from one big broken city

The stage is set for a new Bengaluru with three municipalities. How did the process take place? What did the committee that was supposed to restructure Bengaluru say in its report?

The Karnataka State cabinet accepted the interim report of BBMP Restructuring Committee, with an in-principle decision to divide Bengaluru into three municipalities. The Committee which has come up with plans on how to restructure Bengaluru City felt that dividing is the best way to rule this city, and suggested that there could be a structure of five to eight municipalities. The interim report was submitted to the government on March 19th, 2015.

With this, it has become certain that Bengaluru will be divided into three or more pieces. If this happens, you will not have to travel all the way from K R Puram to Hudson Circle, to see what your councillors and mayor are doing in the corporation. The process of restructuring also promises to solve the problem of garbage, water, roads and other issues you face in the big broken Bengaluru.

The structure of the division is not finalised yet. It will take the completion of ward delimitation process, and submission of final report of the Committee to draw the boundaries of divided Bengaluru. While Bangalore Political Action Committee (BPAC) has suggested a five-way division of the city based on geographical and administrative considerations, Indian Institute of Science (IISc) has suggested a three-way division based on topography of the city.

IISc scientists suggested a three-way division of Bengaluru based on topography. Source: BBMP Restructuring Committee

More municipalities not ruled out

V Ravichandar, urban expert who is also a member of the B S Patil Committee, told Citizen Matters that the Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has in principle agreed to form more municipalities if required, if the data shows the requirement. The data analysis is being done by the Committee. The Committee is supposed to complete its work in June 2015.

The report that has been placed online on the Restructuring Committee website has explained that the idea is to have a three-tier governance for Bengaluru. The report explains that the first level would be ward level, where ward committees will work along with councillors. The second level would be the municipal level, with a mayor and a commissioner. Two zonal councils will exist within a municipality.

Retaining Brand Bengaluru

The third level would be the Greater Bengaluru Authority, with the Metropolitan Planning Committee as its governing body. This body will have two thirds of its members as people’s representatives, who will be councillors or mayors drawn from the local municipalities. One third of the members will be experts. This body will look into the planning of the region, plan enforcement and administration.

The Committee has three more months to complete its work. In this time, the Committee will also examine if there is any need to amend the existing Karnataka Municipal Council (KMC) act and other acts, check the missing points in the related acts and suggest amendments to accommodate the proposed structure.

The proposal would be to have a separate act to govern Bengaluru, that will accommodate the regional layer of the Greater Bengaluru Authority, with its own elected mayor in the long run. This will be enabled by a new Bengaluru Region Act, an act meant for governing Bengaluru, which does not yet exist in any other city in India. This, according to the report, will also ensure the Brand Bengaluru does not dilute.

Interestingly, such a separate bill to govern Bengaluru imagined even in the ABIDe task force report published in 2010, Plan Bengaluru 2020.

Ravichandar said the Committee will suggest a vendor-customer relationship between parastatal agencies such as BWSSB and BESCOM and the municipalities, where the municipality will be treated as a customer by the parastatals. Municipality will take the decision to avail the services of such parastatals for a cost.

Extensive consultation process

The Committee so far has consulted 16 MLAs, 28 Corporators, senior officials of 20 government agencies, six Institutional groups and over 1000 citizen representatives of RWAs / NGOs across eight BBMP zones. The website received more than 70 suggestions by citizens.

The Committee reviewed over 50 reports of literature on municipal governance from Indian and International cities. Currently data collection on the amount of money spent on Bengaluru by various agencies is underway, along with GIS mapping of the entire city with around 145 layers of information, that includes properties, water, lake, transport and so on. A scenario of how Bengaluru will be in 2040 will be analysed and required suggestions will be made.

The stakeholder consultations highlighted the public sentiment of resentment over a failed system, with garbage, water and road problems in parts of the city, leakage in civil contracts and other problems.

Read the copy of the interim report below:

BBMP Second Interim Report on BBMP Restructuring by ShreeDN

Full disclosure: V Ravichandar is an investor in Oorvani Media Pvt Ltd, the publisher of Citizen Matters.

Related Articles

BBMP division to be finalised by June 2015
Panel invites your suggestions on dividing Bengaluru

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Aarey colony has not been taken seriously by any government: Incumbent MP Gajanan Kirtikar

Gajanan Kirtikar, who joined hands with Eknath Shinde, says that SRA schemes should be allowed for Aarey residents to save the forest.

As India gets ready to vote to decide who will represent them in Parliament, Citizen Matters is speaking to elected Parliamentary representatives from Mumbai. We will ask them about the work they have done for the city, policies they have supported and why Mumbaikars should cast votes in their favour (or of their political parties). As part of this series, we spoke to Gajanan Kirtikar, who represented Mumbai North West for the past two terms. He is an active Parliamentarian who was one of top 10 MPs who asked the maximum number of questions during their tenure, according to a report…

Similar Story

Lok Sabha 2024: Know your MP — Gajanan Kirtikar, Mumbai North West

After long innings in politics, Gajanan Kirtikar faces the challenge of his son staying with Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena in 2024 elections.

Name: Gajanan Kirtikar  Constituency: Mumbai North West Gajanan Kirtikar, 80 is an old hand in Maharashtra politics and has risen up the ranks of his party. He has always been with the Shiv Sena, having been part of the core team of Bal Thackeray, subsequently working under Uddhav Thackeray. He chose to move to the Shiv Sena faction led by present chief minister Eknath Shinde.  He served as a legislator for four terms between 1990 to 2009 and then entered the Parliament for two terms from 2014. He also served as the minister of state for home and tourism and…