A penny more for schools?

The old demon is back. Government tries to cap fees at private-unaided schools, in response to campaigning parents. The courts will have to step in again.

In the commoditised world, if you don’t like the price of a shirt or even a car, you can shop around to your hearts content.

Schooling though is a different cup of tea altogether. It is an investment parents make for their children, and certainly no commodity. So when private unaided schools increase fees regularly, parents will simply not automatically move out in a hurry. Switching costs time, energy, money and stress on children.

Some parents straightaway suspect that they are being exploited because they’re not about to change schools at the drop of a hat. In market economics, this is called ‘stickiness’ of a customer base. Vendors can exploit this with ‘predatory pricing’. Other parents would like some control on fees, even as they don’t want government interference.

A queue for school admissions. Demand continues to outstrip supply. File pic: Chitra Aiyer.

On the other hand, it is equally true that private schools are setup with by people who are clearly not in for charity. They have a mission of education that is both commercial and entrepreneurial in motive. Secondly, there is a real gap between the massive demand for quality schooling and actual availability of schools and seats.

The result is a complicated mess of feelings and a touchy topic.

Citizen Matters has been hearing from Bangaloreans worried about particularly steep hikes. Last month, we decided to do a dipstick survey of parents views on this and spoke to several schools too. The findings reflected significant worry. See this article here.

Government jumps in

The state government, so far wary of taking issue with private unaided schools appears to have fired the first shot recently.

"The Karnataka government has fixed a 30 per cent profit margin for private schools. This after parents protested against the alarming rise in the admission costs", CNN-IBN reported on its website a few days ago. Tuition fees should not exceed a profit of 30 per cent and schools cannot charge any non-tuition fees up to class five, a government circular reportedly said.

The report has also quoted commissioner for public instruction Tushar Girinath as saying that the government has considered the fee structure and then taken a decision.

The government’s move appears to come as a result of the efforts of an association of city parents taking up the issue.

"The only solution to this problem where the parents are not put to trouble, is by the government implementing the uniform fee structure across the state," says A R Ashok Kumar Adiga, President, Bangalore Schools Parents’ Association. Kumar spoke to Citizen Matters as part of the survey on fee hikes. Adiga is the founder of the association.

Ashwin Mahesh, who led ABIDe’s Right to Education working group for the state government during 2010-11, promptly pushes the debate to a higher ground. Mahesh is against government regulation of private unaided schools in principle, arguing that it will stifle school entrepreneurship.

"The core problem is the quality of the public (government) schools", says Mahesh. Shortage of quality schools overall is leading to this situation, he notes. "Parents should pressurise the government to create more quality schools", instead of asking the government to intervene in private school pricing policy. "The number of people setting up new private schools may go down", he adds, as a reaction to fee caps, which could in turn hurt access.

And expectedly, Karnataka Unaided Schools Managements’ Association President G S Sharma disagreed with the government’s decision to set a cap on fees. KUSMA offices are at VV Puram, Bangalore. 

Settled or not, this predicament is soon to get worse. RTE admissions are not yet under enforcement. If schools start doing this in 2013-14, low-income students will need to be accommodated, and fee hikes will only get steeper, worry parents.

For now though, the battle is going to be on the fee cap order and very likely in Karnataka High Court. 

RELATED
RELATED

Related Articles

Which school board for your child?
How to choose the right school?
Will private schools allot 25 percent seats for poor children?
‘Do not push RTE into all unaided schools’, says ABIDe
Shock and worry in 2012: school fee hikes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Mathru school transforms lives of special needs children in Bengaluru 

Mukhta Gubbi, founder of Mathru Educational Trust, focuses on the holistic development of students while easing parents' burden.

Mathru Educational Trust for the Blind and Other Disabled, established on January 15, 2001 by Muktha Gubbi, emerged at a time when her life was marked by various challenges that almost led her to despair. She met with a freak accident, in which she lost half of one foot and a close relationship ended, thereafter.  Witnessing a young mother struggling to take care of her blind toddler inspired Muktha to start the Mathru Residential School for the Blind in her time of adversity. Since its inception, the school has empowered countless visually impaired students, who have meritoriously passed out of Mathru school. Mathru now…

Similar Story

One step towards inclusivity: Free higher education for transgender students in Maharashtra

Transgender students welcome the policy but emphasise the need for colleges to prepare and sensitise before it is rolled out.

Marcus is a trans man pursuing a master’s degree in sports management from IISM, Mumbai. As a member of the transgender community, Marcus welcomes the state government's decision to provide free higher education to transgender students in public universities in Maharashtra and in affiliated colleges. "This will be effective because a lot of trans people also come from the lower economic strata. Unfortunately, they have to leave their households early on because their parents don’t approve of their identity. They have to either manage their studies or drop out,” says Marcus. Policy's inclusivity objective On December 5th, at a meeting…