Kannada film’s anti-piracy stunt backfires

Debutant director Pawan's film has been doing well at the box office. But his anti-piracy moves have landed the film in trouble with the censor board.

Kannada film director Pawan Kumar’s decision to include 12 minutes of extra scenes in his debut movie ‘Lifeu Ishtene’, starring Diganth, has run into trouble with the State Censor Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The scenes were originally part of the film certified by the censor board but were cut when the movie was released in theatres a few weeks ago. They are now being included in the screenings. The move was made to combat piracy and get more people to theatres to watch the movie.

Debutant Director’s anti-piracy act lands him in trouble. Pic courtesy: Pawan Kumar

The makers did not obtain a no-objection-certificate from the board before they deleted the scenes, in the first release. A criminal case has been filed by the board against the producers and exhibitors.

An apology letter was given to K Nagaraja, IAS officer and Regional Officer, of CBFC by Pawan Kumar and the producers, last week. "When there is a violation in the Ciematograph Act, it is an offence against the State. There is no question of me forgiving the violations," says Nagaraja.

Pawan does not deny that a violation was committed. "We did not know about the rule and if we did, would we have publicised it? It is an honest mistake" he says. He adds that deleting scenes before a release and including them later, is a common industry practice and they are being unfairly targeted because of a previous issue with the concerned officer. "We will make our case in the court and are ready to face the consequences," he says. Earlier the censor board had objected to the use of the word ‘sucker’ in the film’s tag line and the word had to be removed from the posters and the film.

The Cinematograph Act, 1952, Section 7, sub-section 1(b) states that any person, "without lawful authority alters or tampers with in any way after it has been certified….shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both, and in the case of a continuing offence with a further fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees for each day which the offence continues."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Are Chennai streets safe for women? Here’s what they told us

85.9% of women in Chennai who responded to the survey think that CCTV cameras in public spaces make streets safer for women.

In view of Women's Day, observed on March 8, Citizen Matters conducted an online survey on women's safety in Chennai. As many as 171 women took part in this survey between the age group of 18 to 51 years. These women were from areas like Sholinganallur, Adyar, T Nagar, Kotturpuram, Thiruvanmiyur, Royapuram, Perambur, Madipakkam, Anna Nagar and other parts of Chennai. Though we circulated the survey across Chennai, many of the responses were from women in the Southern parts of Chennai, indicating the lack of access for women from areas of North Chennai to take part in such online surveys.…

Similar Story

The consequences of eviction: Women face the wrath of domestic violence

Why should evictions cause domestic violence? Our conversation with women in Chennai's resettlement areas brings out many harsh realities.

At 16, when Jency* got married to a man her family chose for her, she dreamt of a blissful life. Her husband, a carpenter, toiled to make ends meet, while she was a homemaker. Life was tough but they were content. "During weekends, he would take us to the beach and once in a while we went to the movies. Eating Delhi appalam and walking along the seashore at Marina Beach with my husband and my two kids is one of my favourite happy memories," she says. That was Jency's life in the past. The sole breadwinner of her family,…