State politics vs Bangalore

With due respect to Karnataka legislators, the ‘findings’ of the The Joint House Committee (JHC) about the Bengaluru International Airport can be termed irresponsible at the least and retrograde.

The JHC report maligns famous business leaders and civil servants. These people don’t need to prove their credentials or expertise in managing complex projects or assignments in their long careers. The committee members have truly maligned Narayana Murthy, who had offered his services for free. The officers who were part of the original team are Karnataka’s best.

The JHC will have a lot to explain if they are grilled by an independent body about their accusations especially about the design of the airport. It appears the report is based on hearsay, personal bias and conjecture without backing them with sufficient research.

While the point about structures depicting the culture and glory of Karnataka is pertinent, extending it to “safeguarding the interest of the state’ – sounds like a political speech. Today, in the market era, safeguarding the interest of the customer is most important and if that is taken care of, everything else will fall into its place. And, in political parlance, ‘safeguarding the interests of the state’ means safeguarding the interests of politicians.

And wanting the BIA to be headed by an “Indian who can understand local aspirations and requirements” is simply retrograde. Today, it does not matter who heads an organisation, whether Indian or an expat as long the job gets done.

Rajeev Chandrashekar’s arguments about competition and monopoly appear a little far fetched. Can’t think of many cities which have multiple airports that compete with each other. With India modernising or opening airports only now competition is still a far cry. Sure, his views about the PPP model, serving mainly the private party is well made.

And those who are hoping for the reopening of the HAL Airport soon are simply ambitious. It could be possible perhaps after five years when the traffic builds up.

Bangalore a milch cow

When ABIDE came up two years ago Bangaloreans thought there was hope for the city. Those, particularly Rajeev Chandrashekar, were certain of not committing the same mistakes which its earlier avatar BATF did before it became irrelevant. But now, it appears that when the agenda of the state’s political leaders is to squeeze the maximum out of the city while they are in power, no city-focused body has a chance. There’s too much at stake for them to let go of the city which is a cash cow.

The only solution for global cities such as Bangalore and Mumbai is to convert them into union territories with independent powers. Here the states will have to pay to the city government if they have government offices there. Or they are free to move out to smaller towns.

To the dismay of Bangaloreans, political leadership in Karnataka has been blatantly self-serving.

Whatever Bangalore is today is despite the calibre of the state leadership. It has a logic and momentum of its own. The city will thrive.  

Support Citizen Matters - independent, Reader-funded media that covers your city like no other.DONATE


  1. >>The only solution for global cities such >>as Bangalore and Mumbai is to convert them >>into union territories with independent >>powers.

    amazing idea swamy . because bangalore hogs all the states resources and attention. for eg. just on transport, 30,000 crores will be spent just on bangalores transport! -,%20Phasing%20&%20Financing%20Plan%20%20oct%2007.pdf

    this, when yeddy says he doesnt have money to cancel out loans of farmers affected by floods.

  2. >>The JHC report maligns famous business >>leaders and civil servants.

    so what if the perosn is a ‘famou’s business leader. how does that qualify him to head a public project? oh right, the good thing is they use best practices from business in public sector – farmers lands taken over for electronic city and also for the airport.

    >>When ABIDE came up two years ago >>Bangaloreans thought there was hope for >>the city.
    some bangloreans though there was hope. those bangloreans who like to rule by proxy, felt hope.

    4-6 lakh people use majestic bus-stand everyday and 2-3 lakh use, hardly any improvement in infrastructure for them. for the 30,000 people who use the airport a day, the whole city is changed. we’ve got our priorities fully right.

  3. your article is as irresponsible..

    First the so called business leaders who bask in limelight of media show no vision for future when offered public position. They only want positive publicity, but when it comes to taking some
    blame even media comes to save their self-created gods..

    And stop this Bangalorean vs state & all this pseudo cosmo culture. The Bangalore city survives on power, grains & water flowing thro state.
    It is no island for fools who want to spend their time partying, boozing while rest of the mortals toil to earn their bread.

    “There is no city without the state”.

Comments are closed.