Near Whitefield, Panchayat and BDA in tax tussle

Residents of five private layouts near Whitefield are running between Panchayat and BDA to get their khatas. Both want collect property taxes from homeowners!

Five private layouts that were approved by the BDA in Bangalore East, Sheegehalli panchayat near Whitefield, are in a quandary on whom to collect Khatas from. The layouts do not fall under BBMP limits and both panchayat and BDA insist that they have the right to collect taxes from the residents.

BDA’s go-ahead

The authorisation letter says that BDA had transferred all its layouts to BBMP in October 2007 as per a Government Order on May 5, 2007; but since some layouts did not come under BBMP, BDA will collect taxes from these property owners, for the owners’ convenience.

It also says that the properties will be handed over to the panchayat when µthe government issues an order for it. Before 2007, BDA had been collecting taxes from layouts. The letter says that BDA can collect taxes accounted from 2007.

Around November, last year BDA (East) Revenue Officer (RO) started sending notices to the layouts requesting tax payment. The notice referred to an authorization letter dated 26 August 2010 signed by the BDA Chairman, Commissioner and Secretary, empowering the Revenue offices to collect taxes from BDA layouts that fall outside BBMP limits.

But last December, the panchayat officials shot off a letter to the residents saying that the claims made by the BDA officer is false, and that panchayat can collect taxes as per the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act 1993. The letter also says that in case of default of payment, the panchayat can stop registration of properties and withdraw the non-objection certificate given for electricity connection. The letter was signed by Panchayat Development Officer Amrish Kumar and Panchayat President Savitha K.

Redstone Akshaya layout (gated) is one of the five BDA approved private layouts in Sheegehalli. Pic: Navya P K

The residents are in a fix as to whom they should pay taxes to. Raghavendra Rao, President of the owners’ association at the BDA-approved Chaithanya Samparpan layout, says that they have not paid taxes yet, owing to the confusion. The layout was formed in 2004 and residents moved in 2007. "We have been meeting BDA officials for over a year to get khatas, they had said that our layout does not come under their jurisdiction. Panchayat was open to collecting taxes then, but the khata rates they fixed were very high compared to BDA rates – they demanded around Rs 10,000 per person. They were also open to negotiation, which means that the rates were not fixed," he says.

Sheegehalli Panchayat Development Officer Amrish Kumar says that according to Panchayat Raj Act, a maximum of 1% of the property value can be charged for transfer of khatas to residents. BBMP charges much lesser – it levies 2% of the stamp duty paid during sale, plus additional charges not higher than Rs 200.

BDA on the other hand isn’t sure if khatas issued by the Panchayath is even valid. B V Ramalingaiah, BDA (East) RO, says, "Panchayatas are not authorised to collect taxes. We cannot say if their khatas would be valid. We have served notices to more than 500 houses in these layouts, residents are yet to submit the tax forms."

Raghavendra Rao says that some residents are ready to collect khatas from panchayats when they have to sell their property. T Ramesh, former owner of a site at Chaithanya Samarpan, says that he had paid property taxes and got khatas from the panchayat during the sale of his property about 6 months back.

"The Registrar at KR Puram said that I had to get khata from the panchayat office to register the sale. I paid the exact amounts as prescribed by panchayat officials – both for property tax and for khata." Ramesh says that he was not even aware of the possibility of getting a BDA khata.  Raghu Mariyappan, who bought the site from Ramesh, also says that he is not aware of BDA issuing khatas. "I have been trying to get my khata from the panchayat after the sale," he says.

Sheegehalli panchayat office has already collected taxes from some residents in BDA approved layouts. Pic: Navya P K

 

Both BDA and panchayat officials say that they need to collect taxes for developmental works. Panchayat President Savitha, who had co-signed the letter asking residents to pay up, however is not sure of her reasons for doing so. She instead pointed to her husband for explanation. "BDA sent a letter to residents, so we also sent a letter. About the reason for demanding taxes, you can ask my husband, his opinion is my opinion," Savitha said. Savitha’s husband Suresh Babu, handing over a copy of the letter at the panchayat office to Citizen Matters, clarified that apartment complexes are the main sources of revenue for the panchayat. "We need this revenue to undertake works in the panchayat. We fix the tax rates accordingly," he says.

Tax rates for panchayat and BDA differ

Panchayat rate
45 paise per sq ft (vacant land)
Rs 1.50 per sq ft (apartments)
Rs 3 per sq ft (villas/homes)

BDA’s tax rates
(Same as BBMP’s lowest, F zone)
20 paise per sq ft (vacant)
Rs 1.20 per sq ft (apartments and villas)

State Advocate-General Ashok Harenahalli says that BDA is entitled to collect taxes from layouts approved by it, as per BDA Act, 1976. "Developmental works inside the layout is also BDA’s responsibility. Usually BDA layouts are transferred to BBMP and not to panchayat, so until BBMP extends its limits to include the village or the layouts are specifically handed over to BBMP, BDA has authority over them. But BDA does accept panchayat khatas as valid," he says.

In other BDA divisions, the ROs say that taxes are being collected from private layouts, without any opposition. Dhanalakshmi, RO for West division, says that there are eight layouts – Sir M Visveswaraya layout block 1 to 8 near Kengeri – under panchayat area, in her division. "We started collecting taxes from them after the 2010 authorization. Residents have been paying taxes accounting from 2007. I don’t know about any opposition from the panchayat." Same situation prevails in South and North divisions too.

Comments:

  1. Murari Agarwal says:

    Is the issue resolved? Many more layouts are upcoming in the vicinity who have to take Khata. It will be helpful if current status is posted.

  2. Navya P K says:

    ‘@Murari Agarwal: The issue has not been resolved yet. Both BDA and Panchayat officials expect residents to pay up, but residents are waiting for some clarity from these agencies.

  3. Rakesh Sharma says:

    Is this issue resolved now ? If BBMP has any plan to include sheegehalli village in its limits in near future

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Bengaluru politicians across party lines bat for Mekedatu project

Environmentalists warn that the project could have a massive impact on the Cauvery forest that is home to critically endangered wildlife.

The Mekedatu project has been proposed, opposed and has lain forgotten several times over the past many decades. However, the project idea is revived during every election. The current issue of water shortage in Bengaluru has particularly spurred interest in it again. Politicians from both the BJP and Congress in Karnataka are now using the project as an election campaign talking point. Mekedatu, which is Kannada for goat’s crossing, is a rocky outcrop along the river Cauvery. It is situated within the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary, around three kilometres from the confluence of Arkavathy and Cauvery River. Read more: Water shortage…

Similar Story

Lok Sabha 2024: Know your MP — Arvind Sawant, Mumbai South

Two-time MP Arvind Sawant and a candidate for upcoming elections for Uddhav Thackeray's Sena faction, is confident of winning.

Name: Arvind Sawant Constituency: Mumbai South Two-term member of Parliament from Mumbai South constituency, Arvind Sawant, 73, started his political journey as a party worker with the Shiv Sena, when he started participating in agitations such as the Maharashtra- Karnataka border dispute protests.  He got into the trade union movement, when he founded the workers union of the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam limited (MTNL), where he worked.  Subsequently, he quit his job in 1995 to plunge into full-time politics and was nominated twice as member of legislative council ( MLC) from 1996-2010. He also played an active role in the Bharatiya…